HKMA SPM
HKMA SPM: Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1 e-Banking) + Coordination with C-RAF

HKMA SPM HKMA-SPM-TM-Technology-TM-G-1-CRAF-Coord: HKMA SPM Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1) + Coordination with C-RAF

HKMA SPM Technology Management (TM) module family + coordination with sectoral cybersecurity frameworks. TM MODULE FAMILY: (1) TM-G-1 General Principles for Technology Risk Management - foundational module on technology risk governance + framework + roles + IT strategy + policies + risk assessment + project management + system development + change management + IT operations + capacity + problem + incident + information security + access + privileged access + network + crypto + DLP + vulnerability + endpoint + monitoring + threat intel + IR; SEPARATELY TRACKED in this corpus as detailed module; ~26 sub-section codes (TM-G-1.2.1 through TM-G-1.7.3); (2) TM-G-2 Business Continuity Planning - sound BCP + DR + IT continuity + RTO/RPO + critical service identification + testing + crisis management + supplier dependency; (3) TM-G-3 Information Technology + Cyber Risk Management - cyber risk-specific module + supplements C-RAF expectations; (4) TM-G-4 Public Cloud Services - HKMA-specific cloud risk management expectations + due diligence + contractual + supervisory oversight + concentration + jurisdiction + outsourcing integration; (5) TM-E-1 Risk Management of e-Banking - e-banking governance + customer authentication (MFA) + transaction monitoring + fraud detection + customer protection + application security + sound e-banking risk management; (6) TM-M MONITORING + supervisory communications + reporting expectations; (7) TM-N NEW TECHNOLOGIES + emerging tech (AI + ML + cloud + DLT + virtual banking + cryptocurrency + tokenization) HKMA position + risk-based approach; (8) TM-S SUPERVISORY EXPECTATIONS + sectoral exercises + thematic reviews. COORDINATION WITH SECTORAL CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORKS: HKMA C-RAF v2.0 (verified separately in this corpus) operationalises cybersecurity-specific expectations + 7-domain maturity model + IRA + iCAST; TM-G-1 + TM-G-3 provide foundational principles; CFI (Cybersecurity Fortification Initiative) + CISP + PDP + Professional Development complement; SUPERVISORY COMMUNICATIONS + CIRCULARS supplement modules with specific guidance (cloud + AI + ransomware + cyber-incident reporting + 24-hour SLA). COORDINATION WITH OTHER MODULES: OR-2 (Operational Resilience) + SA-2 (Outsourcing) + CG-2 (Systems of Control) + IC-1 (Risk Management) + RR-1 (Recovery) all integrate with TM modules for holistic operational + cyber resilience.

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 200 controls across 65 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • ASD37-04 User application hardening (Essential)
  • ASD37-10 Server application hardening (Very Good)
  • ASD37-11 Operating system hardening (Very Good)
  • ASD37-12 Antivirus software with heuristics (Very Good)
  • ASD37-16 Antivirus software with signatures (Limited)
  • ASD37-17 TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
  • ASD37-20 Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
  • ASD37-22 Network segmentation (Excellent)
  • ASD37-25 Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)
  • ASD37-31 Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)
  • ASD37-33 Capture network traffic (Limited)
  • FFIEC-06 Network security and segmentation
  • FFIEC-07 Endpoint protection and detection
  • FFIEC-08 Application security controls
  • FFIEC-09 Encryption and key management
  • FFIEC-10 Secure configuration standards
  • FFIEC-23 Regulatory reporting requirements
  • FFIEC-24 Customer notification procedures
  • FFIEC-25 Post-incident review and improvement

BSI IT-Grundschutz · 7 controls

  • BSI-08 Cryptographic protection of data
  • BSI-18 Incident response planning and testing
  • BSI-20 Incident reporting and notification
  • BSI-21 Forensic analysis capabilities
  • BSI-23 Baseline configuration establishment
  • BSI-24 Configuration change control
  • BSI-26 System component inventory
  • 3.6 Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
  • 3.6.1 Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
  • FEDRAMP-CM-1 Configuration Management Policy
  • FEDRAMP-CM-2 Baseline Configuration
  • FEDRAMP-SC-13 Cryptographic Protection
  • FEDRAMP-SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
  • FEDRAMP-SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

API 1164 · 6 controls

APPI · 4 controls

  • APPI-A31 Provision of Personally Referable Information
  • APPI-A34 Request for Correction, Addition or Deletion
  • APPI-A41 Preparation and Handling of Pseudonymized Personal Information
  • APPI-A43 Preparation of Anonymized Personal Information

Bahrain PDPL · 4 controls

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 · 4 controls

  • DSOMM-1 Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
  • DSOMM-2 Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling
  • DSOMM-3 Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
  • DSOMM-4 Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing
  • CJIS-7 Configuration Management
  • CJIS-8 Media Protection
  • CJIS-9 System and Communications Protection

ISO/IEC 27010:2015 · 3 controls

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 · 3 controls

India DPDP Act · 3 controls

OWASP Top 10:2025 · 3 controls

  • OWASPTOP10-2 A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
  • OWASPTOP10-4 A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
  • OWASPTOP10-9 A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
  • CYB-3 Device Security Measures
  • CYB-5 Cyber Incident Response Plan
  • USMTSA-2 Cybersecurity Assessment and CSO Designation

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

  • CPS234-21 Implementation of Information Security Controls
  • CPS234-25 Internal Audit Review of Information Security Controls
  • 6.6 Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
  • 6.7 Conducting Audit Follow-up

ISO 19011 · 2 controls

  • 6.6 Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
  • 6.7 Conducting Audit Follow-up

ISO 31000:2018 · 2 controls

  • 6.6 Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
  • 6.7 Conducting Audit Follow-up

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 · 2 controls

MITRE D3FEND · 2 controls

OWASP ASVS · 2 controls

  • AUPRV-4 APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information
  • AUPRV-7 Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response
  • D.1 Incident Response Planning
  • D.2 Incident Reporting
  • CPS230-13 Board Accountability for Operational Risk Management
  • 4.4.7 Emergency and Incident Response
  • BB-DPA-20 Sections 50-60 - Registration and Responsibilities
  • CA-12 Deploys Through Policies and Procedures

FIDO2 / WebAuthn · 1 control

  • 62351-9 Cyber security key management

ISO 20000-1 · 1 control

  • 9.1 Risk communication and consultation

ISO 27005 · 1 control

  • 9.1 Risk communication and consultation

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 · 1 control

  • PQC-2 FIPS 203 ML-KEM Implementation - Module-Lattice Key-Encapsulation Mechanism

NIST SP 800-171 · 1 control

  • 3.6.1 Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
  • NISTSP34-3 Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment
  • NGCB-6 Incident Response, 72-Hour NGCB Notification, and Independent Investigation
  • OWASPAPI-6 Security Misconfiguration and Secure API Design
  • PAKPDPB-5 Security of Processing and Personal Data Breach Notification
  • PSPF24-1 Security Culture, Governance, Risk Management
  • SGCYBER-1 Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) Designation and Registration
  • TEFCAREC-1 Common Agreement Conformance and Onboarding
  • USSDWA-2 Cybersecurity Practices (Assessment, Access, Network, IR)
  • VIETNAMCYBER-2 Prohibited Acts (Access, Interception, Forgery, Content)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 200 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.