A written allergen program, shaped by regulation and customer requirements, prevents cross-contact at every stage: causes of cross-contact are identified and handling rules set for raw, intermediate and finished goods; allergens in the recipe are declared on consumer labels or, for goods for further processing, on the label or accompanying papers, and the need for precautionary labelling is assessed (a warning label never replaces controls); controls cover identification in storage, cleaning and changeover, scheduling, airflow, extra protective clothing, dedicated tools and canteen or vending food; and cleaning of contact surfaces is shown to remove allergens.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.