FedRAMP Moderate PS-2: Position Risk Designation

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 11 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-02 Risk appetite and risk tolerance statements are established, communicated, and maintained
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-04 Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-HR-01 Verification of qualification and trustworthiness

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

PS.L2-3.9.1 Screen Individuals

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-HRS-09 Personnel Roles and Responsibilities

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B) Workforce Clearance Procedure (Addressable)

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-PS-2 Position risk designation

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B) Workforce Clearance Procedure (Addressable)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

12.7.1 Personnel screening

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate PS-2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free