FedRAMP High
IR - Incident Response

FedRAMP High IR-2: Incident Response Training

Requires incident response training for system users consistent with their assigned roles, within a defined period of assuming the role and periodically thereafter.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 89 controls across 41 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 5 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
  • 5.26 Response to information security incidents
  • 5.27 Learning from information security incidents
  • 5.28 Collection of evidence
  • 6.3 Information security awareness, education and training

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

  • CIS-11.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Recovery Process
  • CIS-13.1 Centralize Security Event Alerting
  • CIS-17.4 Establish and Maintain an Incident Response Process
  • CIS-17.7 Conduct Routine Incident Response Exercises

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
  • 5.26 Response to information security incidents
  • 5.27 Learning from information security incidents
  • 5.28 Collection of evidence
  • NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01 The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01 The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MI-01 Incidents are contained
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MI-02 Incidents are eradicated

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

PCI DSS 4.0 · 4 controls

  • 12.10.1 Incident response plan
  • 12.10.2 IRP reviewed and tested annually
  • 12.10.3 24/7 incident response coverage
  • 12.10.5 IRP includes monitoring and response to security control alerts

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-A1.3 Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
  • SOC2-CC7.3 Evaluates security events to determine incident status
  • SOC2-CC7.4 Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
  • SOC2-P6.6 Provides notification of breaches and incidents to affected data subjects, regulators, and others to meet the entity's objectives related to privacy

BSI IT-Grundschutz · 3 controls

  • BSI-13 Risk assessment procedures
  • BSI-15 Security categorization
  • BSI-17 Continuous monitoring strategy

ISO/IEC 29134:2023 · 3 controls

API 1164 · 2 controls

IEC 62443 · 2 controls

ISO 22301:2019 · 2 controls

ISO/IEC 27014:2020 · 2 controls

NIST SP 800-181 · 2 controls

  • 2.4.4 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
  • 2.7.2 Food Fraud Plan
  • CH-FADP-21 Data protection impact assessments
  • FADP-7 Data Protection Impact Assessment (Articles 9-10)
  • CRM-1 AML/CFT Compliance
  • CRM-4 Business Risk Assessment
  • CPS230-11 Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk
  • 4.3.1 Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

Bahrain PDPL · 1 control

  • BB-DPA-20 Sections 50-60 - Registration and Responsibilities

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-HR-03 Security training and awareness programme

DORA · 1 control

GDPR · 1 control

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 · 1 control

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 · 1 control

  • 29147-5.11 Researcher Safe Harbour and Legal Posture
  • 3.11 Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.2.2e Practical Exercises in Awareness Training

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in IR - Incident Response

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High IR-2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 89 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.