FedRAMP High IR-1: Policy and Procedures

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 42 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 5 controls

SOC2-CC5.3 COSO principle 12: Deploys control activities through policies and procedures
SOC2-CC7.1 Detection and monitoring procedures for security events are in place
SOC2-CC7.2 Monitors system components for anomalies indicating malicious acts
SOC2-CC7.3 Evaluates security events to determine incident status
SOC2-CC7.4 Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-13.1 Centralize Security Event Alerting
CIS-13.3 Deploy a Network Intrusion Detection Solution
CIS-17.9 Establish and Maintain Security Incident Thresholds
CIS-8.11 Conduct Audit Log Reviews

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
5.26 Response to information security incidents
8.16 Monitoring activities

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
5.26 Response to information security incidents
8.16 Monitoring activities

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-04 The estimated impact and scope of adverse events are understood
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08 Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-02 Incident reports are triaged and validated

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-AU-6 Audit record review, analysis, and reporting
NIST800-IR-1 Policy and procedures for incident response
NIST800-IR-4 Incident handling
NIST800-IR-5 Incident monitoring

PCI DSS 4.0 · 4 controls

10.7.1 Critical security control failure detection (SP)
11.5.1 IDS/IPS in place
12.10.1 Incident response plan
12.10.5 IRP includes monitoring and response to security control alerts

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-LOG-03 Security Monitoring and Alerting
CCM-SEF-06 Event Triage Processes

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

CPS234-P24 Information Security Response Plans

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 · 1 control

MYHR-ENF-1 Mandatory data breach notification

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-GS-7 Define and implement logging, threat detection and incident response strategy

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-SIM-01 Policy for security incident management

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-16 Security Incident Response Plan and Testing

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.17 ICT-related incident management process

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(6)(ii) Response and Reporting (Required)

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-IR-1 Policy and Procedures

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.15.01 Policy and Procedures

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(6)(ii) Response and Reporting (Required)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High IR-1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

If you hold C5 (Germany)29% covered · 291 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free