Providers of GPAI models with systemic risk shall additionally: perform model evaluation incl adversarial testing; assess and mitigate possible systemic risks; track, document and report to the AI Office and competent authorities serious incidents and possible corrective measures; and ensure an adequate level of cybersecurity protection for the model and its infrastructure.
This control maps to 12 controls across 6 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.55 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 12 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.