FedRAMP High
AC - Access Control

FedRAMP High AC-18: Wireless Access

Establish configuration requirements, usage restrictions, authorize wireless access.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

  • CIS-12.5 Centralize Network Authentication, Authorization, and Auditing (AAA)
  • CIS-13.4 Perform Traffic Filtering Between Network Segments
  • CIS-13.9 Deploy Port-Level Access Control
  • CIS-4.8 Uninstall or Disable Unnecessary Services on Enterprise Assets and Software

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

  • 1.3.3 1.3.3 NSCs between wireless networks and the CDE
  • 11.2.1 11.2.1 Detect authorized and rogue wireless access points
  • 11.2.2 11.2.2 Inventory of authorized wireless access points

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 8.20 Networks security
  • 8.21 Security of network services
  • ANSSI-HYG-20 Secure Wi-Fi Access Networks and Separate Usage

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.21 Security of network services
  • AC-18 AC-18 Wireless Access
  • AC-18 AC-18 Wireless Access
  • AC-18 AC-18 Wireless Access

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in AC - Access Control

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High AC-18 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.