CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.6: Collect Network Traffic Flow Logs

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 50 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 8 controls

NIST800-AU-12 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
NIST800-AU-13 AU-13 Monitoring for Information Disclosure
NIST800-AU-2 AU-2 Event Logging
NIST800-CA-3 CA-3 Information Exchange
NIST800-CA-7 CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
NIST800-IR-5 IR-5 Incident Monitoring
NIST800-SC-7 SC-7 Boundary Protection
NIST800-SI-4 SI-4 System Monitoring

FedRAMP High · 6 controls

CM-8(3) Automated Unauthorized Component Detection
IR-5 Incident Monitoring
IR-7(1) Incident Response Assistance | Automation Support for Availability of Information and Support (IR-7(1))
SI-4 System Monitoring
SI-4(18) System Monitoring | Analyze Traffic and Covert Exfiltration (SI-4(18))
SI-4(4) Inbound and Outbound Communications Traffic

FedRAMP Moderate · 6 controls

CM-8(3) Automated Unauthorized Component Detection
IR-5 Incident Monitoring
IR-7(1) Incident Response Assistance | Automation Support for Availability of Information and Support (IR-7(1))
SI-4 System Monitoring
SI-4(18) System Monitoring | Analyze Traffic and Covert Exfiltration (SI-4(18))
SI-4(4) Inbound and Outbound Communications Traffic

ISO 27001:2022 · 5 controls

5.7 Threat intelligence
8.15 Logging
8.16 Monitoring activities
8.20 Networks security
8.21 Security of network services

CMMC 2.0 · 4 controls

AC.L2-3.1.3 Control CUI Flow
AU.L2-3.3.5 Audit Correlation
CA.L2-3.12.3 Security Control Monitoring
SI.L2-3.14.6 Monitor Communications for Attacks

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03 Information is correlated from multiple sources
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-04 The estimated impact and scope of adverse events are understood
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-ID.AM-03 Representations of the organization's authorized network communication and internal and external network data flows are maintained

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-COS-01 Technical safeguards
C5-COS-03 Monitoring of connections in the Cloud Service Provider's network

ISO 27701:2019 · 2 controls

5.7.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
6.9.4 Logging and monitoring

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-22 Put in Place a Secure Internet Access Gateway

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-33 Capture network traffic (Limited)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC04-BP01 Configure service and application logging

Australian Information Security Manual · 1 control

ISM-0634 Gateway event logging

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

LT-4 Enable network logging for security investigation

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

A.6.2.6 AI system operation and monitoring

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.14.06 System Monitoring

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.14.2e Monitor Organizational Systems with Specialized Capabilities

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

11.5.1.1 11.5.1.1 Service providers detect covert malware channels

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CIS Controls v8 have you already done?

CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.6 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CIS Controls v8 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 102 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202266.7% covered · 51 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate62.7% covered · 57 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 557.5% covered · 65 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.050.3% covered · 76 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202249.7% covered · 77 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark49% covered · 78 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 240 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free