CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.2: Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Detection Solution

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 37 controls across 17 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 6 controls

SI-4 System Monitoring
SI-4(1) System Monitoring | System-wide Intrusion Detection System (SI-4(1))
SI-4(23) System Monitoring | Host-based Devices (SI-4(23))
SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity
SI-7(1) Integrity Checks
SI-7(7) Integration of Detection and Response

FedRAMP Moderate · 6 controls

SI-4 System Monitoring
SI-4(1) System Monitoring | System-wide Intrusion Detection System (SI-4(1))
SI-4(23) System Monitoring | Host-based Devices (SI-4(23))
SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity
SI-7(1) Integrity Checks
SI-7(7) Integration of Detection and Response

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-RA-10 RA-10 Threat Hunting
NIST800-SI-4 SI-4 System Monitoring
NIST800-SR-10 SR-10 Inspection of Systems or Components
NIST800-SR-9 SR-9 Tamper Resistance and Detection

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC6.8 CC6.8 Preventing and detecting unauthorised or malicious software
SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 2 controls

ASD37-29 Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
ASD37-30 Endpoint detection and response (Very Good)

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-GS-9 Define and implement endpoint security strategy
ES-1 Use Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

SI.L2-3.14.6 Monitor Communications for Attacks
SI.L2-3.14.7 Identify Unauthorized Use

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-03 Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09 Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

11.5.1 11.5.1 IDS/IPS monitoring of CDE traffic
11.5.2 11.5.2 Change detection on critical files

Australian Information Security Manual · 1 control

ISM-1034 HIPS or EDR on critical servers

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-COS-03 Monitoring of connections in the Cloud Service Provider's network

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.10 Detection

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.14.06 System Monitoring

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.14.2e Monitor Organizational Systems with Specialized Capabilities

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CIS Controls v8 have you already done?

CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CIS Controls v8 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 102 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202266.7% covered · 51 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate62.7% covered · 57 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 557.5% covered · 65 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.050.3% covered · 76 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202249.7% covered · 77 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark49% covered · 78 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 240 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free