CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.11: Tune Security Event Alerting Thresholds

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 36 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 5 controls

NIST800-AU-6 AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
NIST800-CA-7 CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
NIST800-SI-4 SI-4 System Monitoring
NIST800-SI-5 SI-5 Security Alerts, Advisories, and Directives
SP800-53-CA Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring Family

PCI DSS 4.0 · 5 controls

10.4.1 10.4.1 Daily review of security-relevant logs
10.4.2 10.4.2 Periodic review of all other system component logs
10.4.3 10.4.3 Exceptions and anomalies from log review addressed
10.7.1 10.7.1 Service providers detect critical control failures (superseded)
10.7.2 10.7.2 Detect and alert on critical security control failures

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02 Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-03 Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-02 Incident reports are triaged and validated

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies
SOC2-CC7.3 CC7.3 Evaluating security events to identify incidents

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-IR-3 Detection and analysis - create incidents based on high-quality alerts
ASBv3-LT-1 Enable threat detection capabilities

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-LOG-03 Security Monitoring and Alerting
CCM-LOG-13 Failures and Anomalies Reporting

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
8.16 Monitoring activities

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
8.16 Monitoring activities

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-28 Continuous incident detection and response (Excellent)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC04-BP03 Correlate and enrich security alerts

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-16 Logging and Monitoring - Configuration

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AU.L2-3.3.3 Event Review

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.10 Detection

FedRAMP High · 1 control

SI-4(5) System-Generated Alerts

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(5)(ii)(C) Log-in Monitoring (Addressable)

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.3e Advanced Automation and Analytics Capabilities

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(5)(ii)(C) Log-in Monitoring (Addressable)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CIS Controls v8 have you already done?

CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.11 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CIS Controls v8 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 102 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202266.7% covered · 51 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate62.7% covered · 57 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 557.5% covered · 65 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.050.3% covered · 76 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202249.7% covered · 77 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark49% covered · 78 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 240 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free