FedRAMP Moderate SI-4(23): System Monitoring | Host-based Devices. Implement the following host-based monitoring mechanisms at [Assignment: organization-defined system components]: [Assignment: organization-defined host-based monitoring mechanisms]

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 13 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-13.2 Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Detection Solution
CIS-13.7 Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Prevention Solution
CIS-8.2 Collect Audit Logs
CIS-8.8 Collect Command-Line Audit Logs

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 2 controls

ASD37-29 Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)
ASD37-30 Endpoint detection and response (Very Good)

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 Detection and monitoring procedures for security events are in place
SOC2-CC7.2 Monitors system components for anomalies indicating malicious acts

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-UAH-ML3 User Application Hardening - Maturity Level 3

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC06-BP05 Automate compute protection

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ES-1 Use Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-05 Protection Against Malware - Implementation

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09 Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.14.2e Monitor Organizational Systems with Specialized Capabilities

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-SI-4 System monitoring

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

5.2.1 An anti-malware solution(s) is deployed on all system components, except for those system components identified in periodic evaluations per Requirement 5.2.3 that concludes the system components are not at risk from malware

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate SI-4(23) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free