C5 (Germany) C5-COS-05: Networks for administration

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 46 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CMMC 2.0 · 4 controls

AC.L2-3.1.14 Remote Access Routing
AC.L2-3.1.15 Privileged Remote Access
MA.L2-3.7.5 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC.L2-3.13.3 Role Separation

FedRAMP High · 4 controls

AC-17 Remote Access
AC-17(3) Managed Access Control Points
MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC-2 Separation of System and User Functionality

FedRAMP Moderate · 4 controls

AC-17 Remote Access
AC-17(3) Managed Access Control Points
MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC-2 Separation of System and User Functionality

UK Cyber Essentials · 4 controls

CE-AC.5 Separate Admin Accounts for Administrative Activities
CE-AC.7 MFA for Administrative Accounts
CE-FW.3 Block Unauthenticated Inbound Connections
CE-FW.7 Restrict Firewall Administrative Interface from the Internet

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC02-BP01 Use strong sign-in mechanisms
SEC05-BP01 Create network layers
SEC06-BP03 Reduce manual management and interactive access

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

CIS-12.3 Securely Manage Network Infrastructure
CIS-12.8 Establish and Maintain Dedicated Computing Resources for All Administrative Work
CIS-4.6 Securely Manage Enterprise Assets and Software

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 3 controls

03.01.12 Remote Access
03.07.05 Nonlocal Maintenance
03.13.01 Boundary Protection

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-AC-17 AC-17 Remote Access
NIST800-MA-4 MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
NIST800-SC-2 SC-2 Separation of System and User Functionality

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 2 controls

ANSSI-HYG-27 Prohibit Internet Access from Administration Workstations and Servers
ANSSI-HYG-28 Use a Dedicated and Partitioned Network for Administration

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-DS-3 Secure DevOps infrastructure
ASBv3-PA-6 Use privileged access workstations

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-IAM-09 Segregation of Privileged Access Roles
CCM-IVS-06 Segmentation and Segregation

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

8.2 Privileged access rights
8.22 Segregation of networks

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

8.2 Privileged access rights
8.22 Segregation of networks

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-AC-17 Remote Access
161R1-MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-MFA-ML2 Multi-Factor Authentication - Maturity Level 2

ISO 27017:2015 · 1 control

CLD.12.1.5 Administrator's operational security

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.j Multi-factor or continuous authentication, secured communications and secured emergency communications

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

2.2.7 2.2.7 Non-console administrative access encrypted

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-COS-05 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free