C5 (Germany) C5-COS-02: Security requirements for connections in the Cloud Service Provider's network

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 49 controls across 21 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 6 controls

CA-3 Information Exchange
CA-9 Internal System Connections
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(3) Access Points
SC-7(4) External Telecommunications Services
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

FedRAMP Moderate · 6 controls

CA-3 Information Exchange
CA-9 Internal System Connections
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(3) Access Points
SC-7(4) External Telecommunications Services
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 3 controls

ANSSI-HYG-07 Authorise Network Connection Only for Managed Equipment
ANSSI-HYG-19 Segment the Network and Partition the Zones
ANSSI-HYG-25 Secure Dedicated Network Interconnections with Partners

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC05-BP01 Create network layers
SEC05-BP02 Control traffic flow within your network layers
SEC09-BP03 Authenticate network communications

Azure Security Benchmark · 3 controls

ASBv3-GS-4 Define and implement network security strategy
NS-1 Establish network segmentation boundaries
NS-2 Secure cloud services with network controls

CMMC 2.0 · 3 controls

AC.L2-3.1.20 External Connections
SC.L2-3.13.1 Boundary Protection
SC.L2-3.13.6 Network Communication by Exception

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 3 controls

161R1-AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
161R1-SC-1 Policy and Procedures
161R1-SC-7 Boundary Protection

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-CA-3 CA-3 Information Exchange
NIST800-CA-9 CA-9 Internal System Connections
NIST800-SC-7 SC-7 Boundary Protection

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

1.1.1 1.1.1 Requirement 1 policies and procedures governed
1.2.1 1.2.1 Ruleset configuration standards for NSCs
1.4.1 1.4.1 NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-12.2 Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture
CIS-4.2 Establish and Maintain a Secure Configuration Process for Network Infrastructure

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

8.21 Security of network services
8.22 Segregation of networks

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-03 Representations of the organization's authorized network communication and internal and external network data flows are maintained
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01 Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.12.05 Information Exchange
03.13.01 Boundary Protection

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-22 Network segmentation (Excellent)

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IVS-03 Network Security

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.g Basic cyber hygiene practices and cybersecurity training

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.5.3e Prohibit Connection of Unknown or Unverified System Components

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-FW.4 Approve and Document Inbound Rules

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-COS-02 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free