FedRAMP High
AC - Access Control

FedRAMP High AC-17(3): Managed Access Control Points

Route remote accesses through FedRAMP-defined number of managed network access control points.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 19 controls across 16 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • ASBv3-IM-9 Secure user access to existing applications
  • NS-3 Deploy firewall at the edge of enterprise network

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-12.7 Ensure Remote Devices Utilize a VPN and are Connecting to an Enterprise’s AAA Infrastructure
  • CIS-13.5 Manage Access Control for Remote Assets

UK Cyber Essentials · 2 controls

  • CE-FW.3 Block Unauthenticated Inbound Connections
  • CE-FW.7 Restrict Firewall Administrative Interface from the Internet
  • ANSSI-HYG-28 Use a Dedicated and Partitioned Network for Administration
  • ASD37-08 Deny direct internet connectivity (Excellent)

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.20 Networks security

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 6.7 Remote working

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 1.4.1 NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC6.1 Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in AC - Access Control

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High AC-17(3) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 19 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.