C5 (Germany) C5-COS-06: Segregation of data traffic in jointly used network environments

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 36 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 3 controls

ANSSI-HYG-19 Segment the Network and Partition the Zones
ANSSI-HYG-23 Partition Internet Facing Services from the Rest of the Information System
ANSSI-HYG-28 Use a Dedicated and Partitioned Network for Administration

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

CIS-12.2 Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture
CIS-13.4 Perform Traffic Filtering Between Network Segments
CIS-3.12 Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity

CMMC 2.0 · 3 controls

AC.L2-3.1.3 Control CUI Flow
SC.L2-3.13.4 Shared Resource Control
SC.L2-3.13.5 Public-Access System Separation

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
SC-7 Boundary Protection

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
SC-7 Boundary Protection

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC01-BP01 Separate workloads using accounts
SEC05-BP01 Create network layers

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-GS-2 Define and implement enterprise segmentation/separation of duties strategy
NS-1 Establish network segmentation boundaries

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

8.20 Networks security
8.22 Segregation of networks

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
161R1-SC-4 Information in Shared Resources

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.01.03 Information Flow Enforcement
03.13.04 Information in Shared System Resources

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-AC-4 AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
NIST800-SC-32 SC-32 System Partitioning

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-22 Network segmentation (Excellent)

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IVS-06 Segmentation and Segregation

ISO 27017:2015 · 1 control

CLD.13.1.4 Alignment of security management for virtual and physical networks

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01 Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.13.4e Physical and Logical Isolation Techniques

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

1.3.1 1.3.1 Inbound CDE traffic restricted

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-COS-06 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free