Azure Security Benchmark NS-2: Secure cloud services with network controls

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 54 controls across 22 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 6 controls

AC-20 Use of External Systems
AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
CA-9 Internal System Connections
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(3) Access Points
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

FedRAMP Moderate · 6 controls

AC-20 Use of External Systems
AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
CA-9 Internal System Connections
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(3) Access Points
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

CMMC 2.0 · 4 controls

AC.L2-3.1.20 External Connections
AC.L2-3.1.3 Control CUI Flow
SC.L2-3.13.1 Boundary Protection
SC.L2-3.13.6 Network Communication by Exception

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 4 controls

03.01.03 Information Flow Enforcement
03.01.20 Use of External Systems
03.13.01 Boundary Protection
03.13.06 Network Communications - Deny by Default - Allow by Exception

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 3 controls

ANSSI-HYG-19 Segment the Network and Partition the Zones
ANSSI-HYG-23 Partition Internet Facing Services from the Rest of the Information System
ANSSI-HYG-25 Secure Dedicated Network Interconnections with Partners

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
8.12 Data leakage prevention
8.21 Security of network services

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

8.12 Data leakage prevention
8.20 Networks security
8.21 Security of network services

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-AC-4 AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
NIST800-CA-9 CA-9 Internal System Connections
NIST800-SC-7 SC-7 Boundary Protection

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

1.3.1 1.3.1 Inbound CDE traffic restricted
1.4.2 1.4.2 Restricting traffic entering trusted networks from outside
1.4.4 1.4.4 Cardholder data stores not reachable from untrusted networks

UK Cyber Essentials · 3 controls

CE-FW.3 Block Unauthenticated Inbound Connections
CE-FW.4 Approve and Document Inbound Rules
CE-FW.7 Restrict Firewall Administrative Interface from the Internet

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC05-BP02 Control traffic flow within your network layers
SEC08-BP04 Enforce access control

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-COS-02 Security requirements for connections in the Cloud Service Provider's network
C5-COS-04 Cross-network access

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-13.4 Perform Traffic Filtering Between Network Segments
CIS-4.4 Implement and Manage a Firewall on Servers

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-SC-4 Information in Shared Resources
161R1-SC-7 Boundary Protection

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-22 Network segmentation (Excellent)

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IVS-03 Network Security

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.312(e)(1) Transmission Security (Standard)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01 Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.13.1e Create Diversity in System Components to Limit Malicious Code Propagation

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.312(e)(1) Transmission Security (Standard)

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark NS-2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free