Azure Security Benchmark NS-1: Establish network segmentation boundaries

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 69 controls across 24 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 6 controls

ANSSI-HYG-04 Identify the Most Sensitive Information and Servers and Maintain a Network Diagram
ANSSI-HYG-07 Authorise Network Connection Only for Managed Equipment
ANSSI-HYG-17 Enable and Configure the Local Firewall on Workstations
ANSSI-HYG-19 Segment the Network and Partition the Zones
ANSSI-HYG-23 Partition Internet Facing Services from the Rest of the Information System
ANSSI-HYG-28 Use a Dedicated and Partitioned Network for Administration

FedRAMP High · 5 controls

AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
CA-9 Internal System Connections
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

FedRAMP Moderate · 5 controls

AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
CA-9 Internal System Connections
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

PCI DSS 4.0 · 5 controls

1.3.1 1.3.1 Inbound CDE traffic restricted
1.3.2 1.3.2 Outbound CDE traffic restricted
1.4.1 1.4.1 NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks
11.4.5 11.4.5 Annual segmentation penetration testing
2.2.3 2.2.3 Primary functions with different security levels managed

C5 (Germany) · 4 controls

C5-COS-02 Security requirements for connections in the Cloud Service Provider's network
C5-COS-03 Monitoring of connections in the Cloud Service Provider's network
C5-COS-06 Segregation of data traffic in jointly used network environments
C5-PSS-10 Software Defined Networking

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-12.2 Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture
CIS-13.4 Perform Traffic Filtering Between Network Segments
CIS-3.12 Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
CIS-4.4 Implement and Manage a Firewall on Servers

CMMC 2.0 · 4 controls

AC.L2-3.1.3 Control CUI Flow
SC.L2-3.13.1 Boundary Protection
SC.L2-3.13.5 Public-Access System Separation
SC.L2-3.13.6 Network Communication by Exception

NIST SP 800-172 · 4 controls

3.1.3e Employ Secure Information Transfer Solutions
3.13.1e Create Diversity in System Components to Limit Malicious Code Propagation
3.13.4e Physical and Logical Isolation Techniques
3.14.3e Include Systems in Scope of Enhanced Requirements or Segregate into Purpose-Specific Networks

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-AC-4 AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
NIST800-CA-9 CA-9 Internal System Connections
NIST800-SC-32 SC-32 System Partitioning
NIST800-SC-7 SC-7 Boundary Protection

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 3 controls

ASD37-08 Deny direct internet connectivity (Excellent)
ASD37-22 Network segmentation (Excellent)
ASD37-25 Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC01-BP01 Separate workloads using accounts
SEC05-BP01 Create network layers
SEC05-BP02 Control traffic flow within your network layers

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 3 controls

03.01.03 Information Flow Enforcement
03.13.01 Boundary Protection
03.13.06 Network Communications - Deny by Default - Allow by Exception

UK Cyber Essentials · 3 controls

CE-FW.1 Boundary Firewalls Deployed
CE-FW.6 Host-Based Firewall for Remote Workers
CE-SCOPE.1 Scope Definition

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-IVS-03 Network Security
CCM-IVS-06 Segmentation and Segregation

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

8.20 Networks security
8.22 Segregation of networks

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

8.20 Networks security
8.22 Segregation of networks

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-03 Representations of the organization's authorized network communication and internal and external network data flows are maintained
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01 Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
161R1-SC-7 Boundary Protection

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System · 1 control

CBPR-PR-30 Specific proportional safeguards in place

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-2 Secure the network and systems within the data environment

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(A) Isolating Health Care Clearinghouse Functions (Required if applicable)

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(A) Isolating Health Care Clearinghouse Functions (Required if applicable)

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark NS-1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free