APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
Controls

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management CPS230-P31: Remediation of Material Operational Risk Weaknesses

The entity must remediate material weaknesses in its operational risk management including control gaps, weaknesses and failures, supported by clear accountabilities and assurance, addressing root causes promptly, and must keep identified gaps, weaknesses and failures in its operational risk profile until they are remediated.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 36 controls across 21 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 3 controls

  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07 Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational cybersecurity risk discussions
  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-03 Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-06 Risk responses are chosen, prioritized, planned, tracked, and communicated

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

APRA CPS 234 · 2 controls

  • CPS234-28 Escalation of Unremediated Testing Deficiencies
  • CPS234-36 APRA Notification of Material Control Weakness within 10 Business Days

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

  • C5-COM-04 Information on information security performance and management assessment of the ISMS
  • C5-OPS-18 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Concept

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones
  • RA-7 Risk Response

ISO 22301:2019 · 2 controls

  • 10.1 Nonconformity and corrective action
  • 10.2 Continual improvement

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.27 Learning from information security incidents
  • 8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.27 Learning from information security incidents
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC1.5 CC1.5 Accountability for internal control responsibilities (COSO principle 5)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

  • ANSSI-HYG-38 Carry Out Regular Security Checks and Audits and Apply the Corrective Actions

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

  • ASBv3-PV-6 Rapidly and automatically remediate vulnerabilities

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

  • CFTC-SS-21 Remediation of Vulnerabilities and Deficiencies

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CIS-17.4 Establish and Maintain an Incident Response Process

DORA · 1 control

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • CA-5 Plan of Action and Milestones

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Controls

You are reading one control. How much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management have you already done?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management CPS230-P31 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 30 of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.069.8% covered · 13 gapsIf you hold DORA62.8% covered · 16 gapsIf you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 558.1% covered · 18 gapsIf you hold FedRAMP Moderate55.8% covered · 19 gapsIf you hold SOC 248.8% covered · 22 gapsIf you hold ISO 27001:202244.2% covered · 24 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 4 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 eachBrowse the graph free

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 36 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.

MCP endpointAll APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls