CIS Controls v8 CIS-4.4: Implement and Manage a Firewall on Servers

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 47 controls across 22 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 6 controls

1.2.5 1.2.5 Allowed services, protocols and ports justified
1.3.1 1.3.1 Inbound CDE traffic restricted
1.3.2 1.3.2 Outbound CDE traffic restricted
1.4.1 1.4.1 NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks
1.4.2 1.4.2 Restricting traffic entering trusted networks from outside
1.4.3 1.4.3 Anti-spoofing measures at trusted boundary

FedRAMP High · 5 controls

CM-7 Least Functionality
SC-5 Denial-of-Service Protection
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(12) Boundary Protection | Host-based Protection (SC-7(12))
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

FedRAMP Moderate · 5 controls

CM-7 Least Functionality
SC-5 Denial-of-Service Protection
SC-7 Boundary Protection
SC-7(12) Boundary Protection | Host-based Protection (SC-7(12))
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

CMMC 2.0 · 4 controls

AC.L2-3.1.20 External Connections
CM.L2-3.4.7 Nonessential Functionality
SC.L2-3.13.1 Boundary Protection
SC.L2-3.13.6 Network Communication by Exception

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-CM-7 CM-7 Least Functionality
NIST800-SC-5 SC-5 Denial-of-service Protection
NIST800-SC-7 SC-7 Boundary Protection

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC5.2 CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)
SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

NS-1 Establish network segmentation boundaries
NS-2 Secure cloud services with network controls

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-IVS-09 Network Defense
CCM-UEM-10 Software Firewall

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) Risk Analysis (Required)
164.312(e)(1) Transmission Security (Standard)

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.13.01 Boundary Protection
03.13.06 Network Communications - Deny by Default - Allow by Exception

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) Risk Analysis (Required)
164.312(e)(1) Transmission Security (Standard)

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-25 Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC05-BP02 Control traffic flow within your network layers

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-2 Secure the network and systems within the data environment

Australian Information Security Manual · 1 control

ISM-1416 Host-based software firewall

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-COS-01 Technical safeguards

CIS Controls v8.1 · 1 control

4.4 Implement and Manage a Firewall on Servers

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01 Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-FW.1 Boundary Firewalls Deployed

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CIS Controls v8 have you already done?

CIS Controls v8 CIS-4.4 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CIS Controls v8 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 102 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202266.7% covered · 51 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate62.7% covered · 57 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 557.5% covered · 65 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.050.3% covered · 76 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202249.7% covered · 77 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark49% covered · 78 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 240 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free