C5 (Germany)
C5: Product Safety and Security

C5 (Germany) C5-PSS-10: Software Defined Networking

Where the service offers software defined networking, keep customer data confidential through suitable SDN procedures, validate the networking functions before releasing new ones or modifying existing ones, and assess and correct identified defects in a risk oriented way.

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
  • NS-1 Establish network segmentation boundaries

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.20 Networks security

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.21 Security of network services

ISO 27017 · 1 control

  • CLD.13.1.4 Alignment of security management for virtual and physical networks
  • NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01 Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
  • 03.13.04 Information in Shared System Resources

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.14.7e Verify Correctness of Security Functions
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in C5: Product Safety and Security

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-PSS-10 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.