FedRAMP Moderate AC-6(2): Non-Privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 20 controls across 17 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-PA-6 Use privileged access workstations
PA-2 Avoid standing access for user accounts and permissions

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-12.8 Establish and Maintain Dedicated Computing Resources for All Administrative Work
CIS-5.4 Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

7.2.5 7.2.5 Application and system accounts least privilege
8.6.1 8.6.1 Interactive use of system accounts controlled

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-ADMIN-ML1 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML1)

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-08 Identify Each Person by Name and Separate User and Administrator Roles

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC02-BP06 Employ user groups and attributes

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AC.L2-3.1.6 Non-Privileged Account Use

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IAM-09 Segregation of Privileged Access Roles

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.01.06 Least Privilege - Privileged Accounts

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AC-6 AC-6 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 HIGH · 1 control

AC-6(2) AC-6(2) Least Privilege | Non-privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE · 1 control

AC-6(2) AC-6(2) Least Privilege | Non-privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-AC.5 Separate Admin Accounts for Administrative Activities

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate AC-6(2) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free