Structured internal review lets the operator verify that its fatigue management system works and find improvements: periodic review of practice against documented policies and operating limits, mechanisms to identify, report, investigate and record non-conformances, investigation of incidents for fatigue contribution, and corrective action to prevent recurrence, with ongoing monitoring including work and rest records rather than annual checks alone. The criteria: the operator monitors fatigue data including work and rest records, roster variances and driver feedback to verify controls operate as intended day to day; review processes detect not only clear non-conformances but patterns of increasing fatigue risk before an incident; incidents and near misses are investigated for the extent of fatigue contribution; corrective actions target underlying causes such as unreasonable scheduling or inadequate training rather than symptoms; monitoring and investigation outcomes update fatigue policies, rosters or training; and periodic reviews of the fatigue system run at intervals commensurate with the risk of the work and rest arrangements.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.