PCI DSS 4.0
Req 8: Identify and Authenticate Users

PCI DSS 4.0 8.2.2: 8.2.2 Shared and generic IDs only by exception

Group, shared or generic IDs, and any other shared authentication credentials, may be used only where needed as an exception, and must be managed so that: use of the ID is blocked unless an exceptional circumstance calls for it; use lasts only as long as the exceptional circumstance requires; a business justification is documented; management explicitly approves the use; the identity of the individual is verified before the account is made available; and every action taken is attributable to one individual user. The guidance suggests password vaults or controls like sudo, and gives a break-glass emergency account as an example of an exception. Applicability: not intended for point-of-sale terminal user accounts that are limited to a single card number per transaction. Objective under the customized approach: all actions carried out with group, shared or generic IDs can be attributed to an individual person.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 38 controls across 21 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 5 controls

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.16 Identity management
  • 5.17 Authentication information
  • 8.2 Privileged access rights
  • 8.5 Secure authentication

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)
  • SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
  • SOC2-CC6.2 CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
  • SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

  • CIS-5.2 Use Unique Passwords
  • CIS-5.4 Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts
  • CIS-5.5 Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Accounts

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

  • AC-2(9) Restrictions on Use of Shared and Group Accounts
  • IA-2(5) Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Individual Authentication with Group Authentication (IA-2(5))

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • AC-2(9) Restrictions on Use of Shared and Group Accounts
  • IA-2(5) Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) | Individual Authentication with Group Authentication (IA-2(5))
  • NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01 Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
  • NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

  • E8-ADMIN-ML1 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML1)
  • ANSSI-HYG-08 Identify Each Person by Name and Separate User and Administrator Roles
  • ASD37-21 Disable local administrator accounts (Excellent)

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.16 Identity management

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 6.6.2 User access management

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

  • CE-AC.2 Authenticate Users Before Granting Access

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Req 8: Identify and Authenticate Users

You are reading one control. How much of PCI DSS 4.0 have you already done?

PCI DSS 4.0 8.2.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 38 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.