FedRAMP Moderate AC-2(9): Restrictions on Use of Shared and Group Accounts

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
SOC2-CC6.2 CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-5.2 Use Unique Passwords
CIS-5.5 Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Accounts

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-ADMIN-ML2 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML2)

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-21 Disable local administrator accounts (Excellent)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC01-BP02 Secure account root user and properties

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-PA-5 Set up emergency access

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AC.L2-3.1.1 Authorized Access Control

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IAM-13 Uniquely Identifiable Users

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.312(a)(2)(i) Unique User Identification (Required)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AC-2 AC-2 Account Management

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.312(a)(2)(i) Unique User Identification (Required)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

8.2.2 8.2.2 Shared and generic IDs only by exception

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-AC.2 Authenticate Users Before Granting Access

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate AC-2(9) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free