FedRAMP High
IA - Identification and Authentication

FedRAMP High IA-2(5): Identification and Authentication (organizational Users) | Individual Authentication with Group Authentication. When shared accounts or authenticators are employed, require users to be individually authenticated before granting access to the shared accounts or resources

Identification and Authentication (organizational Users) | Individual Authentication with Group Authentication. When shared accounts or authenticators are employed, require users to be individually authenticated before granting access to the shared accounts or resources

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 10 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.5 Secure authentication

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.5 Secure authentication
  • 03.05.01 User Identification and Authentication
  • NIST800-IA-2 Identification and authentication of organizational users

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 8.2.2 Group, shared, or generic IDs, or other shared authentication credentials are only used when necessary on an exception basis, and are managed as follows: • ID use is prevented unless needed for an exceptional

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in IA - Identification and Authentication

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High IA-2(5) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 10 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.