Extra obligation for card issuers, and for firms supporting issuing services, that hold SAD: any SAD they keep must (1) be restricted to what a legitimate issuing business need requires and be secured, and (2) be encrypted with strong cryptography. Applicability: applies only to issuers and firms supporting issuing services that store SAD; such entities often create and control SAD as part of issuing and may store it only where a legitimate business need exists, meaning one necessary to perform the function delivered by or for the issuer. Objective under the customized approach: SAD is kept only as far as issuing functions require it and is protected against unauthorized access. Future-dated (bullet requiring strong encryption of stored SAD): treated as a best practice up to 31 March 2025 and mandatory since then.
This control maps to 32 controls across 9 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
PCI DSS 4.0 3.3.3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 32 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.