PCI DSS 4.0
Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data

PCI DSS 4.0 3.5.1.2: 3.5.1.2 Disk or partition encryption only on removable media

Where encryption applied to a whole disk or partition, instead of encrypting at database file, column or field level, is what makes PAN unreadable, it may be relied on only (1) on removable electronic media, OR (2) on non-removable electronic media where PAN is additionally made unreadable by another mechanism that satisfies Requirement 3.5.1. Applicability: covers any encryption that automatically presents cleartext PAN when a system runs without a specific user request; such encryption may remain but cannot be the sole protection, so stored PAN also needs truncation or data-level encryption; full disk encryption suits only removable media; data centre media such as hot-swappable drives and bulk tape backups count as non-removable; implementations still have to satisfy every remaining encryption and key-management rule in the standard; for card issuers and issuing-service firms it does not apply to PAN accessed for real-time transaction processing but does apply to PAN stored for other purposes. Objective under the customized approach: encrypted PAN is decrypted only when a legitimate business need to access it exists. Future-dated: treated as a best practice up to 31 March 2025 and mandatory since then.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 40 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

CIS Controls v8 · 5 controls

  • CIS-3.11 Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
  • CIS-3.3 Configure Data Access Control Lists
  • CIS-3.9 Encrypt Data on Removable Media
  • CIS-4.11 Enforce Remote Wipe Capability on Portable End-User Devices
  • CIS-6.7 Centralize Access Control

ISO 27001:2022 · 5 controls

  • 5.18 Access rights
  • 7.10 Storage media
  • 8.2 Privileged access rights
  • 8.24 Use of cryptography
  • 8.3 Information access restriction

SOC 2 · 5 controls

  • SOC2-C1.1 C1.1 Identifying and maintaining confidential information
  • SOC2-CC5.2 CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)
  • SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
  • SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
  • SOC2-CC6.5 CC6.5 Protecting data on assets until disposal

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.18 Access rights
  • 7.10 Storage media
  • 8.24 Use of cryptography
  • 8.5 Secure authentication

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

  • AC-19(5) Full Device or Container-Based Encryption
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • SC-28(1) Cryptographic Protection

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

  • AC-19(5) Full Device or Container-Based Encryption
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • SC-28(1) Cryptographic Protection
  • ASBv3-PA-7 Follow just enough administration (least privilege) principle
  • DP-4 Enable data at rest encryption by default

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

  • ANSSI-HYG-31 Encrypt Sensitive Data, in Particular on Equipment That May Be Lost

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-CRY-03 Encryption of sensitive data for storage

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 6.7.1 Cryptographic controls
  • NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01 The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data

You are reading one control. How much of PCI DSS 4.0 have you already done?

PCI DSS 4.0 3.5.1.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 40 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.