Where an employer relies on the defence for covert surveillance kept for workplace security, it must be able to prove that: the surveillance was solely to protect the security of the workplace or the people in it, with any surveillance of employees incidental to that; a real and significant risk existed that security would be compromised without covert surveillance; and the workforce there, or a body representing a substantial share of it, received written notice of the planned security surveillance before it began. A record from such surveillance that is unrelated to security is admitted against an employee in disciplinary or legal proceedings only where the desirability of admitting it outweighs the undesirability of evidence obtained that way.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.