No one uses or discloses surveillance information or a record they know or have reasonable cause to suspect came from covert surveillance of an employee at work except for a purpose the section recognises. Where an authority covered the surveillance, relevant purposes are: as the authority's conditions or a Magistrate's s 35 order allow or require; finding out, within the authority, whether an employee is engaged in unlawful activity at work; disciplinary action or legal proceedings over alleged unlawful activity at work; security arrangements or other measures to prevent the kind of unlawful activity identified; averting an imminent threat of serious violence or substantial property damage; disclosure to or use by law enforcement for an offence; proceedings for an offence; and other action authorised or required by the Act. Where no authority covered it, only disclosure to or use by law enforcement for an offence and offence proceedings qualify, plus, for employees of a law enforcement agency, disciplinary or managerial action or proceedings for misconduct or unsatisfactory performance and law enforcement training. Maximum penalty 20 penalty units.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.