NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-RC.RP-05: The integrity of restored assets is verified, systems and services are restored, and normal operating status is confirmed

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 35 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-CM-14 CM-14 Signed Components
NIST800-CP-10 CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution
NIST800-SC-34 SC-34 Non-modifiable Executable Programs
NIST800-SI-7 SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity

PCI DSS 4.0 · 4 controls

10.3.4 10.3.4 File integrity monitoring on audit logs
11.5.2 11.5.2 Change detection on critical files
12.10.1 12.10.1 Incident response plan ready for activation
12.3.1 12.3.1 Targeted risk analysis for flexible-frequency requirements

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution
CP-10(2) System Recovery and Reconstitution | Transaction Recovery (CP-10(2))
SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution
CP-10(2) System Recovery and Reconstitution | Transaction Recovery (CP-10(2))
SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-A1.2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
SOC2-A1.3 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
SOC2-CC8.1 CC8.1 Managing changes to procedures, software, data and infrastructure

Australian Information Security Manual · 2 controls

ISM-1213 Traffic capture after intrusion remediation
ISM-1598 Inspection after maintenance and repair

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

164.312(c)(1) Integrity (Standard)
164.312(c)(2) Mechanism to Authenticate ePHI (Addressable)

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

164.312(c)(1) Integrity (Standard)
164.312(c)(2) Mechanism to Authenticate ePHI (Addressable)

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-36 System recovery capabilities (Very Good)

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-BR-4 Regularly test backup

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-08 Data Backup and Recovery - Regular Testing

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-BCR-08 Backup

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.12 Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.c Business continuity, backup management, disaster recovery and crisis management

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.14.1e Verify Integrity of Security Critical Software and Firmware

NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 · 1 control

RC.RP-05 RC.RP-05 Restored assets checked and root causes remediated before production

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 have you already done?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 NIST-CSF-RC.RP-05 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 73 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202268.9% covered · 33 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 567.9% covered · 34 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)67% covered · 35 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate63.2% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202258.5% covered · 44 gaps If you hold CIS Controls v853.8% covered · 49 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 174 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free