The organization identifies the outside factors that matter for its OH&S outcomes on psychosocial risk. Examples given: pressure passed down the supply chain (deadlines, schedules, output targets); dealings with contractors and their subcontractors, with suppliers and providers, and with other parties; workplaces, resources or equipment shared with others; what customers or clients demand, which can bring violence, harassment or time pressure; the economy's effect on how much work there is, where and for how long; contracts, pay, conditions and industrial relations; the age and gender profile of the available labour pool, including later retirement; fast technological change such as constant device connectivity, automation and artificial intelligence; a more mobile and more diverse workforce with many cultures and languages; and the regional social, economic and public health setting, such as pandemics, natural disasters and financial crises.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.