The organization identifies the inside factors that can affect OH&S outcomes on psychosocial risk. Examples given: governance and management (structure, allocation of roles, how well formal and informal decisions are made, culture, management and communication style, respect for privacy); how firmly it has committed, in policies, guidelines, objectives and strategies, to protecting mental health and well-being; other management systems it runs, such as quality or environmental ones, that interact with psychosocial risk; how large and what kind of workforce it has (big, small, complex, spread out); workforce characteristics such as age, gender, ethnic origin, faith, disability, languages spoken, and reading and number skills; whether workers can recognize psychosocial hazards and handle the risks; where work is done (no fixed site, remote, at home, alone, rural or distant locations); terms and conditions such as flexible, part-time, casual or temporary arrangements, pay and benefits; and whether enough resources are available.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.