The organization must identify and address the obligations, including legal obligations, that it owes to individuals arising from decisions it makes about them based solely on automated processing of their personal data, taking account of jurisdictions that impose specific obligations where such decisions significantly affect the individual, such as notifying that automated decision making exists, allowing objection to it, or providing human intervention, and of jurisdictions where some processing may not be fully automated at all.
This control maps to 20 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 27701:2019 7.3.10 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold SOC 2 and 58 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 289 were rejected on the SOC 2 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 20 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.