The organization must assess whether a privacy impact assessment is needed and carry one out where appropriate whenever it plans to start new processing of personal data or to change existing processing, determining the elements the assessment needs, which can include the types of personal data processed, where it is stored and where it may be transferred, supported by data flow diagrams and data maps, and recognising that some jurisdictions mandate an assessment for cases such as automated decisions with legal effect, large scale processing of special categories, or systematic large scale monitoring of public areas.
This control maps to 36 controls across 21 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 27701:2019 7.2.5 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold SOC 2 and 58 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 289 were rejected on the SOC 2 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 36 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.