ISO 22301:2019
Operation, ISO 22301:2019

ISO 22301:2019 8.2.3: Risk assessment

Put in place and keep up a process for assessing risk that identifies what could disrupt the organization's prioritized activities and the resources those activities need, analyses and evaluates those risks, and decides which ones need treatment.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 98 controls across 48 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • NIST-CSF-GV.OV-02 The cybersecurity risk management strategy is reviewed and adjusted to ensure coverage of organizational requirements and risks
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-02 Risk appetite and risk tolerance statements are established, communicated, and maintained
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-06 A standardized method for calculating, documenting, categorizing, and prioritizing cybersecurity risks is established and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07 Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational cybersecurity risk discussions
  • NIST-CSF-GV.SC-03 Cybersecurity supply chain risk management is integrated into cybersecurity and enterprise risk management, risk assessment, and improvement processes
  • NIST-CSF-GV.SC-06 Planning and due diligence are performed to reduce risks before entering into formal supplier or other third-party relationships
  • NIST-CSF-GV.SC-07 The risks posed by a supplier, their products and services, and other third parties are understood, recorded, prioritized, assessed, responded to, and monitored over the course of the relationship
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-03 Internal and external threats to the organization are identified and recorded
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-04 Potential impacts and likelihoods of threats exploiting vulnerabilities are identified and recorded
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-05 Threats, vulnerabilities, likelihoods, and impacts are used to understand inherent risk and inform risk response prioritization
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10 Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 10 controls

HIPAA Security Rule · 6 controls

PCI DSS 4.0 · 6 controls

  • 12.10.7 12.10.7 Response procedures for PAN found in unexpected locations
  • 12.3.2 12.3.2 Targeted risk analysis for each customized-approach requirement
  • 12.8.3 12.8.3 Due diligence before engaging TPSPs
  • 5.2.3.1 5.2.3.1 Targeted risk analysis sets evaluation frequency
  • 5.3.2.1 5.3.2.1 Targeted risk analysis sets malware scan frequency
  • 5.2.3 5.2.3 Periodic evaluation of components not at risk from malware

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 5 controls

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

  • CIS-15.3 Classify Service Providers
  • CIS-15.5 Assess Service Providers
  • CIS-7.1 Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process
  • CIS-7.2 Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC3.1 CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
  • SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)
  • SOC2-CC3.4 CC3.4 Identifying and assessing significant changes (COSO principle 9)
  • SOC2-CC9.2 CC9.2 Assessing and managing vendor and business partner risk
  • CPS230-11 Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk
  • CPS230-P26 Assessment of Business and Strategic Decisions on the Risk Profile
  • 4.3.1 Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
  • SPC1-4.3.1 Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
  • AWWA-1.2 Risk Assessment
  • AWWA-G430-3 Risk Assessment for Water Systems

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

ISO 28002:2011 · 2 controls

  • A.4.1 A.4.1 Risk assessment and monitoring
  • A.4.3 A.4.3 Monitoring and review of the risk assessment process

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 · 2 controls

  • ISO23894-6.3 AI Risk Assessment
  • 6.4 Risk assessment

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 2 controls

  • 6.1.2 AI risk assessment
  • 8.2 AI risk assessment
  • NFPA1600-04 Risk Assessment
  • NFPA1600-5.1 Risk Assessment

NIST SP 800-171 · 2 controls

AICPA SOC 3 · 1 control

  • SOC3-RISK-ASSESS Risk Assessment Process
  • AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssess ML/TF Risk Assessment

BSI IT-Grundschutz · 1 control

  • BSI-13 Risk assessment procedures

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-OIS-07 Application of the Risk Management Policy

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

COBIT 2019 · 1 control

  • DSS04.02 DSS04.02 Maintain business resilience
  • ITSG33-RA Risk Assessment (RA)
  • CJIS-17 Risk Assessment

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

  • RA-3 Risk Assessment
  • ISAE3402.11 Risk Assessment by Service Auditor

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.21 Managing information security in the ICT supply chain

ISO 31000:2018 · 1 control

  • 6.4 Risk assessment

ISO 9001:2015 · 1 control

  • 8.2.3 Review of the requirements for products and services

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 · 1 control

  • 27003-8.2 Risk Assessment Performance

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 · 1 control

  • 27031-6.3 Risk Assessment for ICT Continuity

ISO/SAE 21434 · 1 control

  • 21434-8 Risk Assessment Methods

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

  • 3.11.1e Threat-Aware Risk Assessment

NY DFS 23 NYCRR 500 · 1 control

  • EUDRDF-2 Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation
  • PICERL-P2 Risk Assessment
  • CO-Other-1 Risk Assessment for ICFR
  • SSAE18-SOC1-02 Risk Assessment
  • UKMSA-2 Risk Assessment and Due Diligence
  • USOFAC-2 Risk Assessment

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Operation, ISO 22301:2019

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 22301:2019 have you already done?

ISO 22301:2019 8.2.3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 98 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.