Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-BCR-02: Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

Analyse the impact of plausible disruptions and the risks behind them, and use the results to set the criteria continuity and resilience strategies must satisfy.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 50 controls across 24 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 22301:2019 · 8 controls

  • 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context
  • 6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities
  • 6.1.2 Addressing risks and opportunities
  • 6.2.1 Establishing business continuity objectives
  • 8.2 Business impact analysis and risk assessment
  • 8.2.1 General
  • 8.2.2 Business impact analysis
  • 8.2.3 Risk assessment
  • CPS230-11 Identification, Assessment and Management of Operational Risk
  • CPS230-19 Tolerance Levels for Each Critical Operation
  • CPS230-26 Critical Operations Register, Continuity Plan and Activation
  • CPS230-34 Tailoring of the Testing Program
  • CPS230-P27 Comprehensive Assessment of the Operational Risk Profile
  • CPS230-P40 Required Content of the Business Continuity Plan

FedRAMP High · 4 controls

  • CP-2 Contingency Plan
  • CP-2(8) Contingency Plan | Identify Critical Assets (CP-2(8))
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment
  • RA-9 Criticality Analysis (RA-9)

FedRAMP Moderate · 4 controls

  • CP-2 Contingency Plan
  • CP-2(8) Contingency Plan | Identify Critical Assets (CP-2(8))
  • RA-3 Risk Assessment
  • RA-9 Criticality Analysis (RA-9)

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

  • NIST-CSF-GV.OC-04 Critical objectives, capabilities, and services that external stakeholders depend on or expect from the organization are understood and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-GV.OC-05 Outcomes, capabilities, and services that the organization depends on are understood and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-04 Potential impacts and likelihoods of threats exploiting vulnerabilities are identified and recorded

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

  • C5-BCM-02 Business impact analysis policies and instructions
  • C5-OPS-06 Data Backup and Recovery - Concept
  • CFTC-SS-17 Enterprise Technology Risk Assessment
  • CFTC-SS-29 Recovery Plan Accounts for Essential Service Providers

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

  • CPS220-14 Scenario Analysis and Stress Testing Programs

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

  • BCR-02 Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

DORA · 1 control

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

ISO 31000:2018 · 1 control

  • 6.4 Risk assessment

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 · 1 control

  • 6.4 Risk assessment

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

  • Art.21.1 Take proportionate all-hazards measures calibrated to the entity's own risk exposure

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience

You are reading one control. How much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 have you already done?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-BCR-02 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 140 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 12 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 50 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.