PCI DSS 4.0
Req 5: Anti-Malware

PCI DSS 4.0 5.3.2.1: 5.3.2.1 Targeted risk analysis sets malware scan frequency

Where the entity relies on periodic malware scans to satisfy Requirement 5.3.2, the scan frequency must be fixed by a targeted risk analysis of the entity, and that analysis must be performed according to every element specified in Requirement 12.3.1. Applicability: applies to entities using periodic malware scans to meet 5.3.2. This was advisory only up to 31 March 2025 and is now required and fully assessed. Objective under the customized approach: the malware solution scans at a frequency matching the entity's risk. Future-dated: treated as a best practice up to 31 March 2025 and mandatory since then.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 17 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-02 Risk appetite and risk tolerance statements are established, communicated, and maintained
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01 Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-04 Potential impacts and likelihoods of threats exploiting vulnerabilities are identified and recorded
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-05 Threats, vulnerabilities, likelihoods, and impacts are used to understand inherent risk and inform risk response prioritization

ISO 22301:2019 · 2 controls

  • 6.1.2 Addressing risks and opportunities
  • 8.2.3 Risk assessment

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CIS-7.5 Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets
  • CCM-TVM-02 Malware Protection Policy and Procedures

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • RA-3 Risk Assessment

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

  • RA-3 Risk Assessment

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC3.2 CC3.2 Identifying and analysing risks to objectives (COSO principle 7)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Req 5: Anti-Malware

You are reading one control. How much of PCI DSS 4.0 have you already done?

PCI DSS 4.0 5.3.2.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 17 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.