Where a CCP critical limit or an OPRP action criterion is missed, the organization makes sure the products affected are identified and that their use and release are kept under control, and keeps documented information on how affected products are identified, assessed and corrected and how corrections are reviewed. Product affected when a CCP critical limit is missed is identified and treated as potentially unsafe. Where an OPRP action criterion is missed, the organization works out the causes of the failure and its consequences for food safety, identifies the product affected and handles it under 8.9.4, and keeps the evaluation results. Documented information records the corrections applied to nonconforming products and processes, including what the nonconformity was, why the failure happened and what it led to.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.