The lead appointed party combines the task teams' TIDPs into the delivery team's MIDP, notifies each task team of changes its TIDP needs, and records new or revised risks in the team's risk register, keeping the appointing party informed where required. It considers the responsibilities in the detailed responsibility matrix; predecessors and dependencies across task teams and the TIDP changes these cause; how long it needs to review and authorize deliveries; and how long the appointing party needs to review and accept them.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.