The appointing party appoints a lead appointed party for every trigger event in the operational phase, including unforeseen ones, and that choice determines which Figure 4 route (M, N or P) applies. The form of appointment is proportionate to how large and complex the asset management response is and follows any procurement rules binding on the appointing party. Asset information terms may be built into the broader asset management appointment, and 5.2.5 can be adapted for a request to provide service (for example to an in-house team).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.