Guidance: the audit client, together with those who manage the programme, should review it to assess whether its objectives were achieved and use lessons learned as inputs to improvement, ensuring review of overall implementation, identification of improvement areas, application of changes, review of auditors' continual professional development, and reporting of results to the client and interested parties. The review should consider monitoring results and trends, conformity with programme processes and documented information, evolving interested party needs, programme records, alternative or new audit methods and auditor evaluation methods, effectiveness of actions on the programme's risks, opportunities and issues, and confidentiality and information security issues.
This control maps to 13 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 13 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.