A process shall govern what happens when any part of the laboratory's activities or results departs from its procedures, quality specifications or user requirements. The process shall make sure that: responsibilities and authorities are defined; immediate and longer-term actions follow from the laboratory's risk analysis; examinations are stopped and reports held back where harm could result; the clinical significance is assessed, including the effect on results already issued; a decision is taken on whether the work is acceptable; results are corrected and users told where needed; and it is defined who may authorize work to restart. Corrective action shall be proportionate to the risk of recurrence, and records of nonconforming work and of the actions taken shall be kept.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.