The plan should contain, or refer to, the requirements the specific case must satisfy, either as a short overview that gives users the context of their work or as a full list drawn from the input documents, and should say when, how and by whom those requirements are reviewed, how the review is recorded, and how conflicts or ambiguities are settled.
This control maps to 7 controls across 7 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 7 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.