The plan should name who, for the specific case, is responsible for making sure the QMS or contract activities are planned, implemented, controlled and monitored; working out how the relevant processes follow and interact with one another; passing requirements to the departments, functions, subcontractors and customers affected and sorting out interface problems; reviewing audit results; authorizing requests to be exempted from the organization's QMS requirements; controlling corrective and preventive action; and reviewing and authorizing any change to, or deviation from, the plan. A flow chart may show the reporting lines.
This control maps to 4 controls across 4 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 4 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.