FedRAMP High
IR - Incident Response

FedRAMP High IR-9: Information Spillage Response (IR-9)

Information Spillage Response. Respond to information spills by: a. Assigning [Assignment: organization-defined personnel or roles] with responsibility for responding to information spills; b. Identifying the specific information involved in the system contamination; c. Alerting

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 17 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation 
  • 5.26 Response to information security incidents

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
  • 5.26 Response to information security incidents

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC7.4 CC7.4 Responding to security incidents
  • SOC2-P6.3 P6.3 Record of unauthorised disclosures and breaches
  • AUCDR-PS-4 Privacy Safeguard 4 - Dealing with unsolicited CDR data
  • DP-2 Monitor anomalies and threats targeting sensitive data

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 12.10.7 12.10.7 Response procedures for PAN found in unexpected locations

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in IR - Incident Response

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High IR-9 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 17 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.