EU AI Act
EU AI Act - High-Risk Classification and Requirements

EU AI Act EUAI-Art.14: Human oversight

High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they can be effectively overseen by natural persons during the period in which they are in use. Oversight measures shall enable persons to understand the relevant capacities and limitations and monitor operation, remain aware of automation bias, correctly interpret the output, decide not to use the output or override or reverse it, intervene in operation, and stop the system.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 14 controls across 7 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • AIRMF-GV-1.2 The characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, and procedures
  • AIRMF-GV-3.2 Policies and procedures are in place to define and differentiate roles and responsibilities for human-AI configurations and oversight of AI systems
  • AIRMF-MN-2.4 Mechanisms are in place and applied, and responsibilities are assigned and understood, to supersede, disengage, or deactivate AI systems that demonstrate performance or outcomes inconsistent with intended use
  • AIRMF-MP-3.5 Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 3 controls

  • A.6.2.2 AI system requirements and specification
  • A.6.2.6 AI system operation and monitoring
  • A.9.2 Processes for responsible use of AI systems

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 · 2 controls

  • 23894-A.5 Human Oversight Controls
  • ISO23894-A.7 Human Oversight of AI

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

GDPR · 1 control

  • GDPR-Art.22 Automated individual decision-making, including profiling

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.3 Segregation of duties

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC5.1 CC5.1 Selecting control activities that mitigate risk (COSO principle 10)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in EU AI Act - High-Risk Classification and Requirements

You are reading one control. How much of EU AI Act have you already done?

EU AI Act EUAI-Art.14 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 14 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.