EU AI Act
EU AI Act - High-Risk Classification and Requirements

EU AI Act EUAI-Art.13: Transparency and provision of information to deployers

High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way as to ensure that their operation is sufficiently transparent to enable deployers to interpret the output and use it appropriately. Providers shall provide instructions for use including the system's intended purpose, level of accuracy/robustness/cybersecurity, foreseeable misuse, performance characteristics, human oversight measures, hardware/software requirements, lifetime and maintenance/care.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 20 controls across 7 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 5 controls

  • A.10.4 Customers
  • A.6.2.6 AI system operation and monitoring
  • A.6.2.7 AI system technical documentation
  • A.8.2 System documentation and information for users
  • A.9.4 Intended use of the AI system
  • AIRMF-MN-1.4 Negative residual risks, defined as the sum of all unmitigated risks, to both downstream acquirers of AI systems and end users are documented
  • AIRMF-MP-1.1 Intended purpose, potentially beneficial uses, context-specific laws, norms and expectations, and prospective settings in which the AI system will be deployed are understood and documented
  • AIRMF-MP-2.2 Information about the AI system's knowledge limits and how system output may be utilized and overseen by humans is documented
  • AIRMF-MS-2.8 Risks associated with transparency and accountability as identified in the MAP function are examined and documented
  • AIRMF-MS-2.9 The AI model is explained, validated, and documented, and AI system output is interpreted within its context as identified in the MAP function and to inform responsible use and governance

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-PI1.1 PI1.1 Quality information about processing objectives, data definitions and specifications
  • SOC2-PI1.4 PI1.4 Controls over output delivery

GDPR · 1 control

  • GDPR-Art.12 Transparent information, communication and modalities for rights

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.37 Documented operating procedures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in EU AI Act - High-Risk Classification and Requirements

You are reading one control. How much of EU AI Act have you already done?

EU AI Act EUAI-Art.13 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 20 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.