ISO/IEC 42001:2023 A.9.2: Processes for responsible use of AI systems

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 22 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
5.34 Privacy and protection of personal identifiable information (PII)

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
5.23 Information security for use of cloud services
8.25 Secure development life cycle

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 4 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02 Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04 Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01 Personnel are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform general tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind

EU AI Act · 3 controls

EUAI-Art.14 Human oversight
EUAI-Art.26 Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systems
EUAI-Art.4 AI literacy

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) · 3 controls

AIRMF-GV-3.2 Policies and procedures are in place to define and differentiate roles and responsibilities for human-AI configurations and oversight of AI systems
AIRMF-GV-6.1 Policies and procedures are in place that address AI risks associated with third-party entities, including risks of infringement of a third party's intellectual property or other rights
AIRMF-MP-3.5 Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function

NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) · 2 controls

4.4 4.4 Align the ICT acceptable use policy with Standard B
5.6.a 5.6 a Permitted use

APPI · 1 control

APPI-A24 Supervision of Employees

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC5.3 CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 have you already done?

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 A.9.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and 30 of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)78.9% covered · 8 gaps If you hold EU AI Act57.9% covered · 16 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free