EU AI Act - High-Risk Classification and Requirements
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.11: Technical documentation
Technical documentation for a high-risk AI system shall be drawn up before the system is placed on the market or put into service and kept up to date. It shall be drawn up in such a way as to demonstrate that the high-risk AI system complies with the Section 2 requirements (incl Annex IV minimum content).
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 22 controls across 7 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
AIRMF-GV-1.1 Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented
AIRMF-MN-4.1 Post-deployment AI system monitoring plans are implemented, including mechanisms for capturing and evaluating input from users and other relevant AI actors, appeal and override, decommissioning, incident response, recovery, and change management
AIRMF-MP-2.1 The specific task, and methods used to implement the task, that the AI system will support is defined
AIRMF-MS-2.1 Test sets, metrics, and details about the tools used during test, evaluation, validation, and verification are documented
You are reading one control. How much of EU AI Act have you already done?
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.11 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.