ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 A.6.2.2: AI system requirements and specification

Write down the requirements for any new AI system and for any material enhancement of an existing one.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 8 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

EU AI Act · 4 controls

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.1 Policies for information security
  • 5.8 Information security in project management
  • 8.25 Secure development life cycle
  • 8.26 Application security requirements

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

  • CIS-16.1 Establish and Maintain a Secure Application Development Process
  • CIS-16.10 Apply Secure Design Principles in Application Architectures
  • CIS-16.14 Conduct Threat Modeling

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.8 Information security in project management
  • 8.25 Secure development life cycle
  • 8.26 Application security requirements
  • AIRMF-MP-1.6 System requirements are elicited from and understood by relevant AI actors, and design decisions take socio-technical implications into account to address AI risks

NIST SP 800-218 · 1 control

  • NIST800-SA-17 SA-17 Developer Security and Privacy Architecture and Design

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 6.5.1 6.5.1 Change control procedure for production

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle

You are reading one control. How much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 have you already done?

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 A.6.2.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and 30 of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.